escalating violence in our community Become a member of the Sensible Sentencing Trust

Mouseover links for full page descriptions

Offender Databases Jeremy Toimata

Jeremy Dean Toimata

Alias

.

Offences

24 charges involving armed robbery, assault with a weapon, kidnapping and injuring with intent to injure in Hamilton and Raglan between March and October 2002

Victims

.

Offender Affiliations

Yiyu Zhang
Chen Chung Yen
Guangyi Ma

Gang affiliations

none known

Age

Born 1984

Current Location

unknown

Parole/Release Dates

Sentenced to seven years in October 2003

Background
From the Waikato Times 29/10/2003
The leader of a Hamilton extortion ring which targeted Chinese students has had his sentence cut after his parents paid $64,000 to the victims. Justice campaigners say the decision does not reflect what society wants. In the Hamilton District Court yesterday, Judge Neil McLean cut Yiyu Zhang's sentence from 14 to 10 1/2 years' jail because of the reparation and his guilty plea during the trial. The law requires judges to consider reparation.

But Act NZ Party justice spokesman Stephen Franks said reparation should be an aggravating, rather than a mitigating factor. "Judges, I think, are not reflecting the fact that compensation and reparation are what any decent society expects. And the person who can afford to make reparation payments and doesn't, should be penalised," he said. Sensible Sentencing Trust national spokesman Garth McVicar said reparation was not reducing offending and was failing to hold criminals accountable. In many cases, it was being ordered but not paid, he said.

Zhang, 23, faced 39 charges including robbery, kidnapping and demanding with menaces. The charges relate to incidents in Hamilton and Raglan between March and October last year. The eight victims have received a total of $64,000 in reparation payments. Judge McLean said there were two issues to consider -- reparation and Zhang's guilty plea, which he made in the middle of the eight- week trial.

Judge McLean acknowledged Zhang's parents' "meaningful offer of reparation" and said while the issue raised concern from some that people could buy justice, that was not the correct approach. "The correct approach is to recognise the benefit of reparation." The judge said the victim impact statements contained mixed views on reparation. "There are messages coming through from some of forgiveness and appreciativeness of the reparation paid. In other cases no amount of money seems to be of any great significance."

Defence lawyer Tom Sutcliffe said Zhang's parents were not wealthy and had limited ability to travel to New Zealand and see their son. His parents had met the victim's families in China, and offered their apologies, he said. Judge McLean said Zhang's evidence had proved to be a two-edge sword for the Crown and the jury took it "with a substantial grain of salt", which may explain the number of acquittals, he said.

Zhang's co-accused, Jeremy Dean Toimata, 19, originally charged with 24 offences but found guilty of 10 in relation to two of the four incidents, was jailed for seven years. Chen Chung Yen, 20, was charged with 14 offences, and found guilty of eight in relation to a kidnapping and robbery of three students in March 2002. He was jailed for 4 1/2 years and ordered to pay $2000 to Zhu Zhang, the only one of his victims still in New Zealand.

Guangyi Ma has already been jailed for 15 months for attempting to pervert the course of justice. The three Chinese men, eligible for release after serving a third of their sentence, will be deported upon their release. Lawyers for Yen and Toimata blamed Zhang for their clients' situations, but Mr Sutcliffe said Zhang fed off the encouragement and support of those around him.

---

Corrections and Additional Information
We endeavour to make this database as accurate as possible, but we are at the mercy of whatever information we can find in various online and offline archives. We rely on the public - that is, people like you - to fill in the gaps that we cannot. If you wish to submit additional information or a correction to this file CLICK HERE . Privacy: Trust policy is that all sources are treated as strictly confidential unless we are explicitly told otherwise. If you wish to see a file removed from this database certain conditions must be met by the offender set out HERE Note that this does NOT apply for those that are the primary offender in a murder, rape, or any sexual offending involving minors. We do not enter into correspondence regarding the guilt/innocence of offenders. Such correspondence is not responded to, especially if the offender concerned has a number of prior convictions

Back to Top