Offender DatabasesViolent and Sexual Offender
Databases |
Victims MemorialA memorial to those murdered in NZ in the last twenty years
Arabic language summary | 
Chinese language summary |
Korean
language summary 0900 SAFE NZ (7233 69)
EDUCATE . ADVOCATE . SUPPORT
| SITEMAP(3)Where to find everything here | FAQFrequently Asked Questions | New!New on this site lately |
escalating violence in our community
Become a member of the
Sensible Sentencing Trust
.
Home invasion, multiple rape, assault with intent to commit rape, indecent assaults, assorted other violent offences in the Napier area up to 1995
.
.
none known
Born 1964
Prison
Under preventive detention
Background
From the Sunday Star Times April 29th 2001
THREE of New Zealand's worst sex criminals are planning an appeal to the Privy Council in efforts to have sentences of preventive detention being served by 131 sex offenders ruled illegal. Prominent human rights lawyer Tony Ellis said he was confident domestic law and international human rights legislation had been breached in sentencing the three men to preventive detention, an indeterminate jail term with parole considered after 10 years.
The case, which Ellis expects to be heard by the end of the year, could force the reclassification of 131 prisoners - all men and all but one a sex criminal - handing many finite jail terms. A petition for special leave to appeal is expected to be heard in London in June. The attorney-general has certified that the case involved questions of "exceptional public importance" and that "the grant of criminal legal is desirable in the public interest".
In draft documents to be presented to the Privy Council, Ellis and Bill of Rights expert Antony Shaw argue the errors in law constitute a "gross miscarriage of justice". They are seeking about $50,000 in legal aid and travel costs. Ellis said preventive detention sentences were based on vague legal wording, breached the presumption of innocence and constituted arbitrary detention. "Put bluntly, preventive detention assumes that once a person is guilty, he will always be guilty."
The men are Tai Wairiki Rameka, Anthony James Harris and Tai Rangi Tarawa. Rameka has a previous conviction for the sustained knife-point indecent assault of his former de facto partner in 1994. Rameka was sentenced in Napier in 1996 to preventive detention for rape, 14 years' jail for a second rape and two years' jail for aggravated burglary and assault with intent. The charges relate to a four-hour knife-point attack on a neighbour in 1995.
His "human rights" case can be found here