escalating violence in our community Become a member of the Sensible Sentencing Trust

Mouseover links for full page descriptions

Offender Databases Paul Neumann

Paul Thomas Neumann

Alias

.

Offences

Unlawful sexual connection with a girl under 12 (x2), indecently assaulting her (x3) and inciting her to perform an indecent act on him (x2) between December 1991 to December 1996.
Previous convictions for indecent assault and unlawful sexual connection in 1993, assaulting a female and breaching a protection order at Mataura in 2006

Victims

.

Offender Affiliations

.

Gang affiliations

none known

Age

Born 1961

Current Location

Prison

Parole/Release Dates

Sentenced to 7 years 9 months in April 2010
A 4 year 6 month non-parole period was set

Background
From Southland Times artitcle 20th April 2010
A 48-year-old Gore man who sexually abused a girl during a five- year period was sentenced to more than seven years' jail yesterday. Paul Thomas Neumann appeared for sentence in the Invercargill District Court on two charges of unlawful sexual connection with the girl, three of indecently assaulting her and two of inciting her to perform an indecent act on him.

The representative charges spanned December 1991 to December 1996, when the girl was between 6 and 11. He was found guilty on all charges by a jury in November. Judge Kevin Phillips said from the outset the acts occurred regularly. He gained access to his victim under the guise of reading her bedtime stories on frequent visits to her house. The court was told Neumann had prior convictions for similar offending, including indecent assault and unlawful sexual connection in 1993.

Although the girl's mother had knowledge of Neumann's past, when her daughter alleged he was abusing her it was met with rejection and a slap in the face, Judge Phillips said. Neumann was allowed to continue visiting her. The girl was removed from the house and put into Child Youth and Family care in 1997 and it was only as a grown woman she could face going to police, he said. In her reparation report, the victim said she would accept payment from Neumann but "it could never make up for what had been done", Judge Phillips said.

She felt she was serving her own life sentence, he said. During the sentencing, the question of Neumann's cognitive ability also arose. There had been several conflicting reports done on Neumann's cognition, with some suggesting he had an intellectual disability and others not. The final report done by a clinical psychologist said Neumann had an average understanding of social rules, he said. There was nothing to say Neumann did not have the cognitive ability to understand the seriousness of the offending, Judge Phillips said of the report.

But the judge did acknowledge Neumann, who was epileptic and had a difficult upbringing, with limited education and personal hardships, was disadvantaged. However, Neumann's offending was considered by the judge as premeditated because he kept going back and his victim was in a highly vulnerable position. Neumann was sentenced to seven years'and nine months' jail and ordered to pay $6000 emotional harm reparation. He also has a non-parole period of four and a half years.

---

Corrections and Additional Information
We endeavour to make this database as accurate as possible, but we are at the mercy of whatever information we can find in various online and offline archives. We rely on the public - that is, people like you - to fill in the gaps that we cannot. If you wish to submit additional information or a correction to this file CLICK HERE . Privacy: Trust policy is that all sources are treated as strictly confidential unless we are explicitly told otherwise. If you wish to see a file removed from this database certain conditions must be met by the offender set out HERE Note that this does NOT apply for those that are the primary offender in a murder, rape, or any sexual offending involving minors. We do not enter into correspondence regarding the guilt/innocence of offenders. Such correspondence is not responded to, especially if the offender concerned has a number of prior convictions

Back to Top